ABSTRACT
Purpose To ensure patient safety and surgical efficiency, much emphasis has been placed on the training of laparoscopic skills using virtual reality simulators. The purpose of this study was to determine whether laparoscopic skills can be objectively quantified by measuring specific skill parameters during training in a virtual reality surgical simulator (VRSS). Materials and Methods Ten medical students (with no laparoscopic experience) and ten urology residents (PGY3-5 with limited laparoscopic experience) were recruited to participate in a ten-week training course in basic laparoscopic skills (camera, cutting, peg transfer and clipping skills) on a VRSS. Data were collected from the training sessions. The time that individuals took to complete each task and the errors that they made were analyzed independently. Results The mean time that individuals took to complete tasks was significantly different between the groups (p < 0.05), with the residents being faster than the medical students. The residents' group also completed the tasks with fewer errors. The majority of the subjects in both groups exhibited a significant improvement in their task completion time and error rate. Conclusion The findings in this study demonstrate that laparoscopic skills can be objectively measured in a VRSS based on quantified skill parameters, including the time spent to complete skill tasks and the associated error rate. We conclude that a VRSS is a feasible tool for training and assessing basic laparoscopic skills. .
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Computer Simulation , Internship and Residency , Laparoscopy/education , Students, Medical , User-Computer Interface , Urology/education , Clinical Competence , Learning Curve , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Task Performance and Analysis , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Fundamento. A escolha da especialidade médica é complexa e multifatorial. A importância dos diferentes fatores varia mundialmente e está associada a diferentes valores e sistemas de educação. O objetivo do estudo é identificar os fatores que determinam essa escolha no Brasil. Métodos. Um questionário foi enviado, via internet (eletronic mail), para graduandos dos seis anos do curso de medicina, solicitando informações demográficas e a avaliação de fatores que influenciam na escolha da especialidade médica. Resultados. A idade média foi de 22 anos. Quanto à influência de familiares, 42,5% dos alunos têm pelo menos um médico como parente próximo, sendo as especialidades mais comuns desse parente: Pediatria, Ginecologia e Obstetrícia e Oftalmologia. A quantidade de respondentes que declararam certeza da carreira a ser seguida ao entrar na faculdade foi 19%, enquanto essa certeza foi de 22,2% na ocasião da pesquisa. Afinidade pela especialidade e estilo de vida foram fatores avaliados como importantes ou muito importantes por mais de 95% dos respondentes. Urgência em ganhar dinheiro rápido, tempo curto de residência, alto rendimento inicial e influência familiar foram os fatores avaliados como menos importantes pelos respondentes na escolha de sua especialidade. Quase metade dos respondentes (49,7%) descartaram uma especialidade que cogitaram fortemente, as principais razões para isso foram ter descoberto não ter afinidade pela especialidade pela qualidade de vida. Conclusões. Afinidade e estilo de vida são os fatores determinantes da escolha e da rejeição de especialidade médica em nosso meio.
Background. Choosing medical specialty is complex and depends on multiple factors. The importance of the different factors varies across the world, according to different values and systems of education. The purpose of this study is to identify the determining factors involved in this choice among medical students in Brazil. Methods. A questionnaire was sent by email to medical students from first to sixth year of a selected institution, asking demographic information and the evaluation of factors that may influence the choice of the medical specialty. Results. The mean age was 22 years. Regarding the influence of relatives, 42.5% of the students has at least one physician as a close relative, the most common specialties of this relative were: Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics and Ophthalmology. 19% of the respondents declared being sure of the career when they entered University, while 22.2% of them were sure about the choice at the occasion of the study. Affinity for the specialty and lifestyle were evaluated as important or very important by more than 95% of respondents. Urge to earn money fast, short time of medical residency, high initial profit and family influence were the factors evaluated as less important by the respondents. Almost half of the respondents (49.7%) rejected a specialty they had strongly cogitated once. The main reasons for this were the lifestyle and the fact that they discovered not having affinity for the specialty. Conclusions. Affinity and medical lifestyle are the defining factors in choosing and rejecting a medical specialty in Brazil.